With the box of documents recovered, Clavell admits with uncharacteristic candor that Dean's methodology has merit.

Dean wrote these reports?

Yeah. Don't get fooled by his eagerness for deep excavations and Blighted materials... The only problem is his methods. They can be quite extreme at times...

These reports document the organisms he managed to save ... with his extreme measures... Some of them were on the brink of extinction...

No, not really. I don't agree with many of his methods... But I must admit that his methods are sometimes rather effective.

He might get carried away at times, but ... he's never forgotten why he became a scientific researcher in the first place.

I used to admire that about him. However, situation has changed. His methods will seriously impact the local ecology. I still stand by my views...

And that is why we got along all these years as fellow researchers.

I do my best to ensure the stability of the testing environment. But ... I'm also aware that I sometimes lack his adventurous spirit.

Nevertheless, someone must assess the outcomes of failures and be responsible for cleaning things up. It is my job to consider every step of the process.

Right now, we should be working toward a consensus that both sides can agree on.

Thank you for finding these reports for me. Reading through them has convinced me to do just that.

I'm heading back to talk with Dean. We shouldn't be arguing like this.

Aww. That's more like it.

Deep down, these two have always shared the same vision. They probably ignored this fact due to their sudden responsibilities and the stressful work.

All they need is an opportunity to come to an agreement. Alright, team. Time to head back.